An authorized, bounded review of selected external and internal assets, producing prioritized findings and acceptance evidence for commercial environments or explicitly scoped agency and prime-contractor systems.
Commercial organizations and agency or prime-contractor teams with written authority for a bounded asset review and an accountable remediation owner.
1–2 weeks
$2,500
Published price is a commercial starting estimate, not a Schedule rate. Government work requires a separately negotiated SOW or task-order scope and price.
Government or federal contracting work is scoped and priced separately through a negotiated statement of work or task order; published prices are not Schedule rates.
A vulnerability assessment is for an organization that needs a current attack-surface baseline, is answering a customer questionnaire, or has inherited systems whose patch and configuration state is uncertain. It can also precede a larger architecture or remediation decision.
The trigger may be a new internet-facing application, a failed review, an acquisition, or a material software change. The assessment is most useful when findings can be connected to asset owners and a realistic follow-up window.
Scope begins with authorized assets, environments, credentials where appropriate, and exclusions. External exposure and selected internal systems are considered according to the agreed boundary; the work does not imply permission to test systems outside that boundary.
Findings are reviewed in context instead of presented as a raw scanner export. Severity considers exploitability, exposure, asset role, data sensitivity, compensating controls, and the likely business consequence of delay.
Recommendations identify patch, configuration, segmentation, credential, or monitoring actions and include a practical verification path. False positives and accepted risks are kept visible so the report remains useful to engineers and leadership.
This service is an assessment, not continuous monitoring or a penetration test. Testing depth, authenticated coverage, and retest work are explicitly scoped before execution.
Agency or prime-contractor testing requires written authorization, named assets, approved methods and windows, access roles, exclusions, escalation contacts, and acceptance evidence in the SOW or rules of engagement. No out-of-scope or third-party testing is implied.
The published timeline is one to two weeks, depending on asset count and access readiness. Government work requires written authorization, named assets, approved methods and access roles, exclusions, escalation, and acceptance evidence before testing.
The report is built to help an owner decide what to fix first and how to demonstrate that the action was completed.
Assessment findings become more valuable when connected to design and governance:
No. A vulnerability assessment identifies and validates known weaknesses and misconfigurations within an authorized scope. A penetration test is a different, deeper exercise with separately defined objectives and rules of engagement.
Only explicitly authorized assets are included. Government SOWs or rules of engagement name assets, environments, methods, timing, credentials, exclusions, escalation contacts, and acceptance evidence before testing.
No. Findings are prioritized using technical severity and business context. Exposure, asset importance, exploitability, compensating controls, and remediation effort all help determine the order of action.
The published service includes retest verification as a deliverable, with its exact boundary depending on the original scope and remediation window. Any expanded testing is agreed separately rather than assumed.